Below you'll find:
💡 Tip from a Researcher who secured 8 (!!) offers
“I can’t stress enough the value of starting to study before you start interviewing.
I blocked a month for networking and interview prep and this had a huge impact on my results! By the time I had my Amazon, DeepMind, and Google interviews I was super confident and prepared.”
Want a Google Doc version of The 2024 Technical Interview Guide for Research Scientists? ➡️ Get emailed a copy here!
40+ researchers and FAANG hiring managers generously contributed their interview questions, input, and guidance over the past year.
The researchers who contributed received more than 100 offers from 30+ companies, including:
So - with that - let's dive in!
Prefer a Google Doc version of The 2024 Technical Interview Guide for Research Scientists? ➡️ Get emailed a copy here!
One of the most challenging parts of the interview process is knowing what to prepare.
We’ve heard so many stories of hours spent studying a certain topic only to get no questions on that topic and 30 minutes of questions on a concept you know well but forgot to brush up on.
Below we’ll share an overview of what you can each when you interview at a FAANG company (or Microsoft, OpenAI, etc.), as well as study plans of several Research Scientists who secured top-tier offers.
One tip for prepping for every company you interview with – make sure to understand the company’s research areas of focus. You can do this by asking questions in your early interviews, asking friends who currently work there, and even looking for posts, tweets, etc. from technical leaders in the company.
Lastly - before we dive into the interview process for each company - we wanted to address one common question we’ve heard: “Will I be asked about AI topics that are important but not necessarily in my research area e.g. how much LLMs does a CV PhD need to know?”
Typically questions will be focused on your area of research. However, the situation might depend on what type of roles you are looking for, what's your area of research, and what's hot.
For example, if you are a PhD in CV but are looking for Research Scientist jobs focused on multimodal LLMs, you will also get questioned on LLM topics. This is also because LLMs are one of the hottest topics right now.
“Don’t I need interviews before I can study for them?”
Researchers who sign up to work with Rora get support landing interviews:
- A resume revamp
- 3-months of LinkedIn Premium
- Networking & outreach templates
- Hiring manager & recruiter names
➡️ See if you qualify
AWS typically conducts 5-7 rounds of interviews, with 2 coding interviews and 1-2 ‘systems or ML design’ interviews, depending on the role.
There’s also a research talk and you can also expect a research interview with more in-depth questions on your research. One researcher who received an AWS offer told us that their research interview was called an “ML depth interview” and “it felt like a research interview discussing topics specific to my experience.”
The most unique thing about the Amazon interview process is how much culture plays a role in every interview – including the technical ones.
One of the researchers we interviewed who got an offer there said that ‘culture’ questions could take up anywhere between 30-50% of an interview.
The best way to prepare? Read Amazon’s Leadership Principles and think of 3 different examples for how you embodied each principle. These examples shouldn't overlap, because you might get questioned about each principle multiple times by different interviewers.
The Anthropic coding screen is thought to be extremely difficult. Not leetcode, but rather objected-oriented programming questions.
You need to get 100% correct in order to get to the next round.
We’re still building out our content on the Anthropic interview process so check back soon :-)
Google DeepMind interviews are different than Google interviews – it’s a totally different hiring process.
When interviewing with DeepMind you can expect to have a:
In terms of DeepMind-specific prep - the researchers we spoke to said that the ML debugging interview was the most “out of distribution” interview so it’s worth preparing a bit extra for. Hint - most of the bugs here seemed to fall into the “stupid” rather than “hard” category.
When you interview for a Research Scientist role at Google, you can expect:
Google Recruiters tend to be extremely helpful and can give you guidance on what to expect in each interview. If they don’t offer this proactively - make sure to ask! And review any docs they share on what to expect in each interview.
However - Google interviewers (hiring managers, peers, etc.) were generally described as intimidating or a bit cold – they don’t spend much time on intros or leave time for a final Q&A - just the interview itself. If you’re not prepared for this, it can catch you off guard.
A final note: historically Google has kept Research Scientist interviews very broad. However - in 2024 they’ve started to make interviews more AI-related. For example - they’ll pick a part of an AI pipeline, like tokenizers, and go deep on it.
If you interview for a research role at Meta - you’re likely to have 6-8 interviews.
The process will likely start with a screening interview with the hiring manager (usually a discussion of your research), followed by 6 “on-site” interviews (these may happen virtually despite the term “on-site”), and a 1-hour research talk.
For the on-site, there’s typically:
A Meta Computer Vision researcher we spoke with recommended spending more time preparing the research and ML fundamental interviews – rather than Leetcode prep.
The Microsoft interview process can be somewhat untraditional.
A researcher we spoke to who received an offer from Microsoft Researcher didn’t even have a coding interview. Instead they were expected to give a research talk and then have subsequent research interviews with people who’d attended your research talk.
These are fairly informal – discussing past work, open topics, and future potential research topics. You can also expect to get some ML design questions related to your research – for example - “how would you apply this topic to XYZ real situation?”
To prepare for these you’ll want to have a general understanding of the most popular research topics in the field and the key papers that support each of those topics.
In 2024, NLP (like RLHF, RAG, and even motto-editing and fine-tuning, etc.) has been a popular discussion topic during Microsoft Research interviews.
Another researcher we spoke to said that their Microsoft interview did not have any data structure and algorithm interviews, but they did have an ML design interview that felt very similar to a system design interview.
Here’s the OpenAI interview process, from a researcher who interviewed with them in summer 2024:
There were 6 rounds of interviews, including:
In terms of what stands out about OpenAI’s interview process - the coding questions (SWE coding, not ML coding) tend to be very, very hard. If you want to work at OpenAI - you really need to be a coding machine. Unlike other companies, the interview process is much more coding-focused than research-focused.
Additionally - the recruiter will give you a two-sentence description of the specific technical interviews in your interview slate - take those seriously! They are telling you exactly what to study for the interview, and they expect you to actually be prepared for that specific interview.
Read every word in the description and know that each word is telling you a topic you should know something about, and think about what kinds of reasonable interview questions they might ask on those topics.
After you have those, take as much time as you need before the on-site to be prepared for those specific topics. Don't be afraid to tell the recruiter you want to schedule the interviews for a specific date a few weeks in the future so that you have time to prepare.
Are you ready to recruit for industry roles?
Take our free diagnostic to evaluate your readiness.
➡️ Get the diagnostic here
Your ability to get multiple, competitive offers depends in large part on how you prepare.
Below we’ll share the study schedules of 5 FAANG researchers who collectively received X offers.
What did they all have in common?
They treated interviewing and studying like a full-time job and were strategic about when in their PhD they chose to interview i.e. during less research-intensive stretches. They studied for 2 weeks full-time at minimum – doing very little research during that time.
One Researcher we spoke to (who received 8 offers) mentioned that they spent an entire month studying for interviews. They dedicated about 90% of their working time to interview prep and did no coding or new experiments for their research during that time.
As with anything - the amount of time you need to prepare will depend upon your prior technical skills and experience.
For someone without prior interview experience, you’ll be in great shape if you dedicate 200 hours to studying LeetCode and ML coding problems, ML concepts, and relevant research papers.
Once you’ve done a few interviews and are more confident in your technical interview skills, future interviews can be prepped for much faster.
I studied 5 - 6 hours per day for 1 month.
I started to get serious about studying before I had any interviews scheduled. This turned out to be smart because - once I started connecting with recruiters and hiring managers - interviews got scheduled fairly quickly. If I had waited to start studying, I wouldn’t have been nearly as prepared.
Btw - it's also worth mentioning how to schedule these interviews -- do the ones that aren't from your dream companies first, as practice, and then you'll be much more prepared in later ones. I did an Apple one first and quickly got rejected because I wasn’t prepared enough! 😂
I asked a few people from my lab who were working at FAANG companies what to study, and also looked at Reddit and Quora to see what people shared about what questions they were asked during researcher interviews.
Here’s how I spent my time studying:
I would do the most classic Leetcode questions, practice my research talk, and refresh LLM knowledge if I’m applying for NLP roles.
I studied for 2 months – typically 3 - 4 hours per day.
As a researcher - my main challenge was coding so I decided to dedicate more time there.
I solved 200 Leetcode and ML questions and also searched Reddit and TeamBlind for interview questions from the companies I was interviewing with.
I also spent time practicing System Design questions and took a “Grokking the Machine Learning Interview” course.
I used the rest of my time to practice my research talk and stay current on machine learning concepts. To do this - I reviewed the key papers in my field.
Beyond that - I recommend to start preparing as early as possible by scheduling a practice interview, ideally with a company you’re not seriously considering joining.
Review core ML/AI concepts. Brush up on key algorithms.
To prepare for my first interview I studied for 3 hours a day for 3 weeks. Then - I would brush up for additional interviews the couple of days leading up to the interview.
Coding Preparation
Since I applied for research scientist positions, the coding questions were similar to easy or medium on LeetCode.
To prepare, I solved most easy-level LeetCode problems tagged by company and about 20% of medium-level ones.
To simulate actual coding interviews, I only read the problem descriptions and hide the immediate examples. I find this approach helpful, as it forced me to create my own examples and test cases. It mirrors real interviews, where interviewers verbally describe questions, and candidates ask clarifying questions and write down test cases.
ML Preparation
I reviewed my old university lecture notes on linear algebra, statistics, and machine learning. Since most positions focused on NLP, I studied transformers in detail and coded self-attention implementations.
Communication & Behavioral
I prepared examples for questions such as:
These questions cover most behavioral questions that I received from most companies.
From my experience, many research interview questions are about the implementation details of transformers, especially the attention mechanism. Nathan Lambert's blog here also mentioned this in the “Lightweight interview lessons” section.
Therefore, with only a few hours, I would take some time to review the standard transformers and the attention mechanism because questions about them can come up frequently.
I studied for 2-3 weeks – about 60 hours total.
I talked to friends who worked at companies that I was interviewing with – primarily contacts from previous internships or alums from my PhD program.
Here’s what my studying focused on:
With only a few hours, I would work out a minimal implementation of transformer and understand surrounding basics about pre and post training.
I studied for several weeks – about 6 hours a day.
Initially I focused on foundational concepts in NLP and common topics in technical interviews, and wherever I felt I was struggling, I tried to delve deeper.
When preparing for my technical interviews, I focused on both understanding foundational concepts in NLP and practicing problem-solving under timed conditions.
My approach was breaking down key areas like data structures (arrays, linked lists, trees, graphs) and algorithms (sorting, searching, dynamic programming) and tackling each one through a mix of YT tutorials and hands-on coding.
I made consistent use of platforms like LeetCode, HackerRank, and Kaggle to refine my problem-solving skills, while setting aside time for mock interviews to get comfortable thinking and explaining my thought process aloud.
Also, reviewing solutions to identify more efficient approaches and learning to articulate trade-offs were crucial steps in my opinion.
If I had only a short time to prepare, I would take a highly structured, intensive approach.
I’d begin by reviewing the most commonly asked topics in technical interviews, like arrays, strings, recursion, and basic dynamic programming.
For the first few days, I’d focus on building a quick, deep understanding of these core concepts, especially prioritizing high-yield topics that are frequent in interviews. I would try a series of medium-level problems in each area, spending time on both speed and accuracy.
I set aside time for mock interviews to get comfortable with thinking and explaining my thought process aloud. I practiced with friends who were also preparing for interviews and also used online platforms that offer mock interview services. The questions I used for mock interviews covered common technical interview topics like arrays, strings, recursion, and basic dynamic programming.
I studied for about 90 hours – 4 weekends of 12 hours per weekend, as well as 1.5 hours per evening for about 12 evenings.
I spent about 20% of my time doing data structures and algorithms practice questions on Leetcode. I probably did 50-80 practice questions in total, and also memorized how to quickly implement BFS, DFS, etc.
I spent about 30% of my time practicing "ML programming". I implemented simple algorithms in numpy, such as KNN, logistic regression etc. following the examples given here. I also implemented some important models in PyTorch (although I wasn't asked to use PyTorch in any interview). I practiced implementing GANs, transformers, CNN, and RNN.
I spent about 20% of my time revising generic ML/data science interview questions (e.g. normalization, regularisation, etc.). I didn't go through any textbooks, and instead went through YouTube videos for any topics I was less familiar with, and made notes.
I spent the remaining 30% of my time revising more deeply technical topics I thought would be relevant to the positions I was interviewing for. I reviewed deep reinforcement learning, transformers and related topics (like different positional encodings), and diffusion models.
For reinforcement learning I quickly skimmed through "Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction" by Sutton and Barto, and went over the most common deep RL algorithms here. For reviewing transformers and diffusion models I mostly relied on YouTube.
A common question we’ve heard from 5th year PhDs is - “What should my solution entail? How much detail should I give?” Many researchers are capable of getting the question right – but not all are capable of answering with the appropriate level of detail and context.
Furthermore - some questions (especially ‘system design’ or ‘ML design’ questions) don’t have just one right answer. Rather, companies are more looking to understand how you think.
We’ve heard this question a lot from PhDs preparing to go into industry – “I can give the right answer, but how much detail or context do they want me to provide?”
Certainly - if 10 people answer a question correctly - some answers are going to feel “more” correct or impressive to interviews than others.
As a general practice - you should give a quick 1 to 2-minute answer and then ask the interviewer if they’d like you to go into more detail on anything.
💡 “Think out loud when you’re answering interview questions -- this way the interviewer can hear your thought process.”
A hiring manager we spoke with said very few people flat-out flunk research scientist interviews. Think about it - most people who are interviewing are in fact researchers from top universities. Many of them have done FAANG internships and/or relevant research.
However - the two factors that separate a good interview from a great interview are:
To point #2 - it is hard to answer these questions on the fly. The more time you take to unpack and understand the question - the better chance you have of coming up with a thoughtful answer. This can also lead to more confident answers – something interviewers also notice.
You can ask specific clarifying questions - “could you tell me more about X” - or do what’s called “mirroring” where you repeat back the question to check for understanding. “Just to make sure I understand, you said XYZ XYZ.”
The interviewer can tell you if you’re missing a piece of information, and may end up adding more context in response to what you said.
This is ESPECIALLY true for system or ML design questions. In fact - you want to ask as many questions as possible.
This is because the interviewer is actually looking to see that you ask questions – and it will actually reflect negatively on you if you don’t.
These questions are designed to be ambiguous - just like many projects or directives in the workplace. Your ability to get a great result relies on your ability to ask questions and simplify the problem.
An interviewer would rather see thoughtful, strategic questions and a mediocre solution rather than a great solution without any questions to demonstrate how you thought about the problem and arrived at the solution you did.
As a Research Scientist who got offers from Amazon, DeepMind, and Google told us - “when it comes to design questions - there is truly no such thing as too many questions.”
For example - let’s say you are told to “Build a summarization model.”
You should ask questions like:
Below you’ll find real FAANG interview questions – along with solutions and feedback on those solutions from researchers at the company that the interview question is from.
This goal here is to help you get an understanding of what interviewers are looking for – and how to prepare to not just answer a question correctly, but provide a sufficient level of thought and detail in order to pass the interview.
A1: The most important detail of a transformer architecture is the concept of attention. If we have a sequence of tokens (could be pixels, patches, words in a sentence etc.), imagine applying a fully connected layer to each token independently. In fact, we do this 3 times to get Query, Keys, and Values. The output of the attention layer is:
V_new = softmax(Q*K’/sqrt(d) )*V
Where d is a scalar corresponding to the dimension of the tokens. These are essentially matrix multiplications.
Multi-headed attention leads to richer representations because we apply the attention equation over “chunks” of the QKV matrices independently.
It is critical to note that the output of an attention block is essentially a linear combination of the input tokens; the Q and K matrices compute weights of the linear combination. Softmax normalizes the weights.
Self-attention allows each token to accept information from any other token to enrich its representation. It enables a global context length, avoiding some of the issues with classic RNNs that may forget information far away from the current token. While attention is quadratic complexity in the sequence length, significant effort has been put into making its complexity approx. linear (e.g. sparse attention, axial attention) while maintaining quality.
Cross attention is very common in vision and NLP whereby the Q/K/V can come from different sources.
Positional encoding is used to indicate relative spatial information to the model (otherwise a token that appears in the first index of the sequence can’t be distinguished from an identical token that appears at the end).
This an average answer overall, but the answer did the following things right:
(1) mentioning the attention equation, and mentioning positional encoding, multi-headed attention;
(2) correctly mentioning one of the major advantages of self-attention: “Self-attention allows each token to accept information from any other token to enrich its representation”.
The solution is missing some details about the transformer architecture, including details of the self-attention equation (for instance, why divide by root(d); description of feed-forward layers; description of layer normalization; details about positional embeddings.
Regarding advantages of self-attention, the answer is missing a critical detail — self-attention allows easy parallelization across sequence length during training time, and encoding during inference time.
a) What is the reason for dividing by root(d) in the self attention equation? (answer in a footnote in the Transformers paper)
b) What is the role of the feed-forward layer in transformers?
c) What are the popular ways of implementing positional embeddings?
d) What is layer norm used for in transformers, and is it better to do pre-layer norm or post-layer norm?
This family of questions is very common in interviews for LLM / NLP-related roles.
A2: Generative models attempt to model a target distribution, possibly with conditions (e.g. GANs, Diffusion models, LLMs). The output of the model is intended to be samples from the training data. In contrast, discriminative models predict useful information from data, such as features, summary statistics, class labels etc.
The answer is correct intuitively, and the answer provides examples of architectures / methods for generative modeling / discriminative modeling.
The answer may seem a bit vague / hand-wavy to interviewers. Providing probabilistic definitions may impress interviewers more (generative tries to model p(x) or p(x, y), discriminative tries to model p(y|x).
It would also be useful to provide more precise example use-cases: generative models are used to create images, new drugs, text articles. Discriminative models can be used for classifying images (like those of birds), classifying sentiment of tweets, etc.
Could you explain probabilistically, what is the difference between generative and discriminative models?
You mentioned GANs. What is a GAN, how does it work, and what is it used for? Give me details of a common implementation of GANs.
Let’s talk more about diffusion models and LLMs. Which models are used for which domains, and why? Can diffusion models be used for language modeling? Why or why not?
This question will likely be the start of a series of questions where the interviewer will try to drill down and dive deep into one particular technical topic. This could possibly depend on what answer the candidate provides at each step, with the interviewer asking for natural follow-ups that ask for more details / explanations for what the candidate said in the previous answer.
For instance, if the candidate mentions LLMs, the follow-up conversation could lead to a discussion of low-level implementation details of an LLM.
In summary, candidates are expected to know low-level details of everything they say.
A3: We can do model parallel or data parallel. Data parallel means that the whole model fits on a GPU, and we clone that model onto each GPU, feed an independent batch of samples to each GPU, perform forward and backward passes to get gradients, then synchronize (sum) the gradients across GPUs such that all models have the same weights after updating them. Most deep learning frameworks support data parallelism, it’s scalable when the model fits on one GPU, and we don’t need to modify the model architecture when scaling. This is most efficient when data batches are balanced across GPUs, and the communication overhead minimized.
Model parallel means we divide chunks of the model onto different GPUs. Forward passes necessarily involve a dependency where information must flow through one GPU before reaching the next; then back propagation must occur on the later GPUs before flowing back to the initial. When the model is too big to fit onto one GPU, we have no choice but to do model parallel.
For large-scale distributed training, systems rely on both principles, and the intent is always scalability, maximizing GPU utilization and minimizing communication bottlenecks. Pipeline Parallelism, Tensor Model parallelism, and ZeRO are more advanced methods that build on these principles.
The answer did a great job at identifying the two major strategies: model / data parallelism. The explanations seem roughly correct. The answer also identified the optimizations done to these paradigms at scale, including pipeline parallelism and ZeRO.
I think the answer was pretty good overall. If I had to nitpick, the pros/cons of each method were not very clearly specified.
(see this paper and this paper for answers / references on these topics)
These kinds of questions may be common in more engineering-heavy roles which expect candidates to implement lower-level architecture details.
In addition to Google, NVIDIA also asked a lot of these kinds of questions.
“Don’t I need interviews before I can study for them?”
Researchers who sign up to work with Rora get support landing interviews:
- A resume revamp
- 3-months of LinkedIn Premium
- Networking & outreach templates
- Hiring manager & recruiter names
➡️ See If You Qualify
A1: Generalization refers to how well a model performs on unseen test data, as compared with performance on training data.
There are 3 kinds of generalization errors:
[1] Overfitting. High variance - when a model is too complex, it performs well on the training data but poorly on validation/test data. The model may have learned noise or fine-grained details in the training data instead of general patterns.
[2] Underfitting. High bias - the model is too simple to capture underlying patterns in the data. Both training and validation error are high, and the model fails to generalize because it can’t even fit the training data. A more complex model or getting more data can help here.
[3] Irreducible error - inherent noise in the data itself, meaning even a perfect model will not capture all the randomness or measurement error in the data.
A large train-validation gap likely indicates overfitting, meaning there is insufficient data or the model is not appropriately regularized. Dropout, L1/L2 weight decay, data augmentation, and early stopping can reduce overfitting.
This is a great answer. I first expected the interviewee to say “the model is too complex / simple”. It’s a plus to explain variance and bias.
–
A2: Given a dataset of pairs {x_i, f(x_i)}, where each x_i is a N-D point and f(x_i) is a scalar, we aim to find the best-fitting line assuming a linear relationship between the input and the output. For example, when N=1, our task is to determine the parameters "m" (slope) and "b" (intercept) that define this relationship:
f(x_i) = m * x_i + b
To solve this problem, we can represent the system in matrix form. First, we set up matrix "A" to hold the input vectors and account for the intercept "b". Each row of "A" corresponds to a training sample, and we append a column of 1s to incorporate the bias term:
A * n = f(x_i)
Where:
"A" is the matrix of input vectors (with an extra column of 1s),
"n" is a vector containing the parameters we are solving for (n = [m, b]),
"f(x_i)" is the vector of outputs (the target values).
To find the parameters "n", we use the normal equation and compute the pseudo-inverse of "A". If the matrix A’ * A (where A’ is the transpose of A) is invertible, we can find the best-fit solution:
n = (A' * A)^(-1) * A' * y
Where:
"A’" is the transpose of matrix A,
"(A' * A)^(-1)" is the inverse of A' * A,
"y" is the vector of target values (f(x_i)).
This equation gives us the parameters "m" and "b" that best fit the data in the least squares sense. Note that linear regression finds the set of parameters that minimizes the MSE (L2 loss) between the model prediction and GT values.
This is a great answer. The best-fit solution is something I want to see.
The best-fit solution only works for linear regression. As a follow-up we’d ask about gradient descent.
It’s rare for this question to be asked because it requires so much time to answer. I actually only saw this question once during an interview process (at Snap).
–
A3: The L2 loss minimizes the sum of squared differences between model prediction and actual values. It is more sensitive to outliers due to the squaring of errors. L2 loss assumes that the residuals between the predicted and actual values follows an approx. normal distribution with zero mean, errors symmetrically distributed around the mean, and most errors small and larger errors occurring less often.
The L1 loss minimizes the absolute value of the difference between the model prediction and the GT value, averaged over some training set. Because errors are penalized linearly instead of quadratically, the loss is more robust to outliers. The assumed distribution for L1 is approx. Laplace distribution with zero mean, which has a sharper peak and heavier tails than the Gaussian distribution.
I want to see L1 loss is more robust to outliers.
The follow-up question would be around how to combine these two losses.
❓❓“Don’t I need interviews before I can study for them?”
Researchers who sign up to work with Rora get support landing interviews:
- A resume revamp
- 3-months of LinkedIn Premium
- Networking & outreach templates
- Hiring manager & recruiter names
➡️ See If You Qualify
We asked 30+ researchers for their most-used study resources – from coding interview prep to deep learning refreshers.
Don't forget to practice under time pressure! ⏰
The Research Talk (also known as a “tech talk” or “job talk”) is a critical part of every Research Scientist interview. Some companies - like Microsoft Research - may only require a Research Talk and then follow-on interviews (i.e. no coding interviews).
Across the 10 FAANG researchers we interviewed for this interview guide – we heard the same sentiment phrased different ways – “if you know your research thoroughly, the research talk should be straightforward.”
While Research Talk formats may vary from company to company, you can generally expect to be required to give a 40 to 55-minute presentation.
The audience will typically be a group of 8 - 10 researchers at the company you’re interviewing with. However - occasionally the audiences for these can be much larger. One researcher we spoke to gave a Research Talk to two dozen people at Google. Another gave their Research Talk to 30+ researchers at Roblox.
At the highest level - you should prepare for a Research Talk the way you’d prepare to present your research at a conference.
“To prepare, I chose two papers that I’m very proud of and that I also felt like were representative of the research I’ve been doing the past four years. I gave a high-level overview, shared my research findings, and concluded with the big picture implications and future ideas for research.
I also tailored the future ideas for research to the research areas of focus for the company I was presenting to. To figure these out, I asked questions about this in my early-round interviews and talked to a friend currently working at the company. You can also look for posts on LinkedIn from technical leaders in the company, and check out recent research papers that have been published by authors from the company.”
“I prepared three versions of my presentation slides for my research (I also included any mentions of notable projects or relevant internship experience):
This demonstrates professionalism and shows the hiring manager that you take your research and presentations seriously.
Including mathematical formulas in some slides is a good idea to support your ideas.
Additionally, have a slide deck prepared for any potential follow-up questions.
You can also include a few slides showcasing your collaborations and unique experiences. This can help with self-advocacy and set the stage for future negotiations if you receive an offer.
In my experience, your slides and presentation are what the team will remember. Making a strong impression can significantly influence the team’s hiring vote.”
It’s common that after each Research Talk there will be about 5 - 10 minutes reserved for questions. This can be the most intimidating part for many researchers since you can’t anticipate exactly what they will ask. (Note - this is different from a dedicated research interview - which is common at most companies)
However - since most people in the room won’t have seen your research before - they will often think of the most obvious next step. So - think back to past research presentations, every conference you presented at, etc. - what were the questions you were asked during Q&A. List those out and either answer them in your core presentation or prepare slides to use during Q&A.
Here are the questions the researchers we spoke to most commonly received during the Q&A section:
“Potential Next Steps / Follow-Up Ideas” is a very common category of questioning during the Q&A section of the Research Talk.
Several researchers we spoke to recommended having a slide deck with all the possible follow-up ideas and next steps they could think of, as well as answers to commonly asked questions. One researcher even did a mini-experiment and outlined the results for the most common follow-on ideas.
Another Google researcher we spoke to (who also had Bloomberg and Allen AI offers) said that every time someone asked them a question about their research during the interview loop, they added it to their slide deck so they would be more prepared for their next Research Talk.
Typically, if it's an AI research interview, you’ll know the name of the interviewer before the interview (if not - ask your recruiter for it). Look up their Google Scholar and read a few of their recent papers.
Not only will this help you think of questions you can ask them - but you can also get a sense of what they’ll ask you. If they’re an expert in the same area as you - you can keep answers to questions about that short. If they’re less familiar, you should spend slightly more time to explain the high-level ideas.
💡 FAQ: “How did you keep up with the latest research so you were prepped for research interviews?”
A: “I set Google Scholar alerts for specific keywords, researchers, and topics of interest. I read surveys / reviews - these summarize recent developments & often identify trends & directions for future research. And, of course, conferences were also helpful (both in-person and virtual!). Many conferences also share recorded talks or proceedings online.”
- A researcher who received 3 FAANG offers
At the end of every interview you’ll typically have a chance to ask the interviewer questions. Not only is this a great way for you to learn about the company, team, and role (remember - you are interviewing the company, too!) – but it’s also a way to demonstrate critical thinking and wanting to understand the broader business.
You’ll want to tailor the questions to the person you’re interviewing with – for example, a hiring manager, a peer, a skip-level manager, etc.
🚨 At Amazon - 50% of every interview consists of behavioral interview Qs.
Don’t overlook behavioral interview prep!
➡️ Sign up for a Free Mock Behavioral Interview
🚨 At Amazon - 50% of every interview consists of behavioral interview Qs.
Don’t overlook behavioral interview prep!
➡️ Sign up for a Free Mock Behavioral Interview
mask tokens are represented by 1, and non-mask tokens by 0 segments start at 0 and end at 1
seq_len=12, num_seg=3, total_mask_tokens=5 Valid output: [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1] The three segments are: [0, 0, 1], [0, 0, 1, 1], and [0, 0, 0, 1, 1]
Generate the segment with a fully vectorized code.. i.e. no loops
This next stage will consist of 3 x 45-minute technical interviews, details are as follows;
❓❓“Don’t I need interviews before I can study for them?”
Researchers who work with Rora get support landing interviews:
- A resume revamp
- 3-months of LinkedIn Premium
- Networking & outreach templates
- Hiring manager & recruiter names
➡️ See If You Qualify
🚨 At Meta you can expect to receive at least 10 behavioral interview Qs throughout the interview process.
Don’t overlook behavioral interview prep!
➡️ Sign up for a Free Mock Behavioral Interview
❓❓“Don’t I need interviews before I can study for them?”
Researchers who work with Rora get support landing interviews:
- A resume revamp
- 3-months of LinkedIn Premium
- Networking & outreach templates
- Hiring manager & recruiter names
➡️ See If You Qualify
These researchers collectively received over 100 offers from leading AI companies and generously shared the exact interview questions they were asked, how they studied, and guidance on winning (vs. losing solutions).
We plan to add to this guide and regularly publish updates.
Help us pay it forward! Submit your interview questions and tips here.
Step 1 is defining the strategy, which often starts by helping you create leverage for your negotiation (e.g. setting up conversations with FAANG recruiters).
Step 2 we decide on anchor numbers and target numbers with the goal of securing a top of band offer, based on our internal verified data sets.
Step 3 we create custom scripts for each of your calls, practice multiple 1:1 mock negotiations, and join your recruiter calls to guide you via chat.