How much does a Facebook Product Designer make? Well, there are lots of, shall we say “speculative” answers to this question online. The goal of this page is to cut through the noise and provide the real data based on our experience with 100s of tech negotiations and 1000s of submitted offers. Below, we’ve listed the top of band compensation for multiple Facebook (or Meta) Product Design levels. There is also a bonus section at the bottom with info on negotiating Facebook Product Design offers.
2022 Top of Band Numbers
Base Salary
$168K
Equity (4 years)
$200K
Signing Bonus
$25K
Performance Bonus
10%
2022 Top of Band Numbers
Base Salary
$197K
Equity (4 years)
$350K
Signing Bonus
$30K
Performance Bonus
15%
2022 Top of Band Numbers
Base Salary
$225K
Equity (4 years)
$650K
Signing Bonus
$50K
Performance Bonus
20%
2022 Top of Band Numbers
Base Salary
$255K
Equity (4 years)
$1.2M
Signing Bonus
$100K
Performance Bonus
25%
So now you've got the compensation data, are you ready to negotiate? Not quite.
First off, comp data is constantly changing. 2022 numbers are coming in higher than the 2021 numbers listed above, and it’s critical to know the full range for each component to optimize your negotiation. But even more than that, many people think knowing the compensation data is the most important part of a negotiation, but it’s not. You can go tell your Meta recruiter that you read online that top of band is $X and that you want that number, but in 90% of cases that won’t work. So what will?
Companies negotiate when they believe you won’t accept their offer. But, since you just finished a long and arduous interview process with them, they know you are likely to accept the job unless you have higher competing offers from other great companies.
This means you need to create leverage and make it believable that you are considering other options but would prefer Facebook if the compensation is comparable. This sounds easy but quickly becomes challenging if you don’t have other offers or if your other offers aren’t higher than the top of band comp numbers you are targeting.
Even if you are in a perfect situation where you have a competing offer with comp just slightly higher than the top of band numbers you are targeting, the negotiation can still get complicated. For example, let’s say your competing offer is from Stripe. Seems like everything is good (Stripe is a well respected large company), but if you bring that to Facebook, their comp team will discount the equity by 25% since Stripe is a private company. All of a sudden they aren’t willing to give you a top of band number because your leverage has been weakened. There are dozens of rules like this that can completely de-rail a negotiation. Think of the system like a black box where a series of inputs can be reliably turned into a specific output, but you need to know how to perfectly setup the inputs
IC3
IC4
IC5
IC6 / M1
IC7 / M2
IC8 / D1
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
Google is a useful comparison because it has set the "industry standard" levelling system. Facebook's is nearly identical but using different names "IC" for most roles and "E" for software engineering and a few other positions. However, many people with FB offers will also be considering other big tech companies like Amazon. Amazon's level comparison chart looks quite a bit different. Quick rule of thumb is that you should subtract 1 from the Amazon level (e.g. FB IC4 = Amazon L5).
Step 1 is defining the strategy, which often starts by helping you create leverage for your negotiation (e.g. setting up conversations with FAANG recruiters).
Step 2 we decide on anchor numbers and target numbers with the goal of securing a top of band offer, based on our internal verified data sets.
Step 3 we create custom scripts for each of your calls, practice multiple 1:1 mock negotiations, and join your recruiter calls to guide you via chat.