Negotiating job offers in the rapidly evolving artificial intelligence field can take time and effort. Many candidates, especially those new to the industry, fall prey to common misconceptions about the negotiation process.
Recently, we’ve helped hundreds of new grad PhDs negotiate job offers from FAANG companies. We’ve also analyzed over 275 AI researcher resumes; analyzing the influence of H-index, citations, and internships on offers. As a bonus, we’ve created a CV template for you to use, and hopefully, you will get more interviews!
This article aims to debunk five prevalent myths about AI job offer negotiations. It uses data from a comprehensive analysis of offers and resumes from top AI companies, including DeepMind, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, and others.
One of the most pervasive myths in job negotiations is that offers are set in stone. This myth is fueled by the tech economy's instability. Many AI Researchers, particularly those early in their careers, believe the initial offer might be the best offer they'll receive. However, our data tells a different story.
Looking at the data from companies like DeepMind, Meta, and Amazon, we see clear evidence that offers are indeed negotiable:
Moreover, our data shows that across all companies analyzed, over 84.73% of candidates had increased their compensation from their initial offer, indicating that negotiation is a typical and expected part of the hiring process.
Advice for candidates:
Most AI Researchers think it’s not worth negotiating since they will get minimal increases (most think 5-10%). This can discourage researchers from putting effort into negotiations. However, our data shows that successful negotiations can lead to substantial increases.
Let's look at some striking examples:
These changes aren’t total outliers - in many cases, successful negotiations resulted in six-figure increases in total compensation.
To further illustrate the potential impact of negotiation, let's look at the average increases across companies:
It's important to note that these increases compound over time. A $50,000 increase in your starting salary could translate to over $200,000 in additional earnings over four years (that’s a down payment for a house!), not accounting for subsequent raises or bonuses that might be calculated as a percentage of your base salary.
Advice for candidates:
Many researchers believe that they have no negotiation leverage without a competing offer from another company. While having multiple offers can undoubtedly strengthen your position, it's not required for a successful negotiation.
Our data shows that many candidates successfully negotiated higher offers without explicitly mentioning counter offers:
In more cases, the researchers without competing offers achieved increases ranging from 15% to 40%.
So - what do you use for leverage if you don’t have other offers?
We recommend leveraging your skills and relevant research experience, to negotiate effectively.
We analyzed 275+ resumes from researchers who received offers from FAANG companies and found some trends across candidates:
Understanding where you stand in comparison to other candidates can be helpful for identifying what you bring to the table that most other candidates don’t.
Advice for candidates:
Some candidates accept an initial offer, planning to negotiate a raise later. However, this approach can be costly. Our data shows that the difference between initial and final offers can be substantial, and waiting to negotiate means potentially losing out on significant compensation.
Consider these examples:
The potential for increased compensation is highest during the initial offer process, and waiting to negotiate later can result in substantial financial losses and strain relationships with your manager/team.
Let's break down the potential losses over time:
Advice for candidates:
Another common misconception is that companies have a standard compensation package for each role with minimal variation. This belief can lead to complacency in negotiating. However, our data reveals significant variance in compensation packages, even for similar roles within the same company.
Let's look at the variance in our data for L4 Research Scientist positions:
This high variance indicates significant room for negotiation and that candidates should not assume their offer represents a fixed standard. Moreover, factors such as citations, h-index, and the number of internships correlated with higher offers:
Let's break down the factors that contribute to this variance:
Advice for candidates:
In conclusion, believing any of these five myths can significantly hamper your ability to negotiate effectively in the AI job market. Remember, your skills are valuable, the market is competitive, and companies have more flexibility in their offers than they tell you.
Don't sell yourself short — book a free call with us today to review your market value and strategize for your negotiation.
Sameer is a Lead Negotiator at Rora where helps individuals understand their market value and supports them during the negotiation process. Sameer has done over 400 negotiations and has been negotiating professionally for 2 years.
Previously - Sameer worked in Venture Capital in North America and multiple start-ups in the Middle East, where he frequently used financial modelling and operational analytics to negotiate equity with investors.
As a negotiator, Sameer has assisted several clients in increasing their offers by millions of dollars, and has helped hundreds of talented candidates advocate to receive their appropriate compensation and seniority.
Over 1000 individuals have used Rora to negotiate more than $10M in pay increases at companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, hundreds of startups, as well as consulting firms such as Vanguard, Cornerstone, BCG, Bain, and McKinsey. Their work has been featured in Forbes, ABC News, The TODAY Show, and theSkimm.
Step 1 is defining the strategy, which often starts by helping you create leverage for your negotiation (e.g. setting up conversations with FAANG recruiters).
Step 2 we decide on anchor numbers and target numbers with the goal of securing a top of band offer, based on our internal verified data sets.
Step 3 we create custom scripts for each of your calls, practice multiple 1:1 mock negotiations, and join your recruiter calls to guide you via chat.